4.5 Article

Cytotoxicity of Recombinant Tamapin and Related Toxin-Like Peptides on Model Cell Lines

Journal

CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages 960-967

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/tx4004193

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACYT), Mexican Government [59297, 166472]
  2. Direccion General de Asuntos del Personal Academio (DGAPA)-UNAM [IN205110, IN207713]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The scorpion toxin tamapin displays the most potent and selective blockage against KCa2.2 channels known to date. In this work, we report the biosynthesis, three-dimensional structure, and cytotoxicity on cancer cell lines (Jurkat E6-1 and human mammary breast cancer MDA-MB-231) of recombinant tamapin and five related peptides bearing mutations on residues (R6A,R7A, R13A, R6A-R7A, and GS-tamapin) that were previously suggested to be important for tamapin's activity. The indicated cell lines were used as they constitutively express KCa2.2 channels. The studied toxin-like peptides displayed lethal responses on Jurkat T cells and breast cancer cells; their effect is dose- and time-dependent with IC50 values in the nanomolar range. The order of potency is r-tamapin > GS-tamapin > R6A > R13A > R6A-R7A > R7A for Jurkat T cells and r-tamapin > R7A for MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Our structural determination by NMR demonstrated that r-tamapin preserves the folding of the alpha KTx5 subfamily and that neither single nor double alanine mutations affect the three-dimensional structure of the wild-type peptide. In contrast, our activity assays show that changes in cytotoxicity are related to the chemical nature of certain residues. Our results suggest that the toxic activity of r-tamapin on Jurkat and breast cancer cells could be mediated by the interaction of charged residues in tamapin with KCa2.2 channels via the apoptotic cell death pathway.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available