4.5 Article

Nicotelline: A Proposed Biomarker and Environmental Tracer for Particulate Matter Derived from Tobacco Smoke

Journal

CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 11, Pages 1615-1631

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/tx400094y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute
  2. California Consortium on Thirdhand Smoke, California Tobacco Related Disease Research Program [20PT-0184]
  3. National Institute on Drug Abuse [P30 DA012393]
  4. National Center for Research Resources [S10 RR026437]
  5. Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education [NIH/R25CA113710]
  6. NIH/NCRR UCSF-CTSI [UL1 RR024131]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Particulate matter (PM) derived from tobacco smoke contains numerous toxic substances. Since the PM and gas phase of tobacco smoke may distribute differently in the environment and substances in them may have different human bioavailability, multiple tracers and biomarkers for tobacco smoke constituents are desirable. Nicotelline is a relatively nonvolatile alkaloid present in tobacco smoke, and therefore, it has the potential to be a suitable tracer and biomarker for tobacco smoke-derived PM. We describe experiments demonstrating that nicotelline is present almost entirely in the PM, in both freshly generated cigarette smoke and aged cigarette smoke. An excellent correlation between the mass of nicotelline and the mass of the PM in aged cigarette smoke was found. We also describe experiments suggesting that the main source of nicotelline in tobacco smoke is dehydrogenation of another little-studied tobacco alkaloid, anatalline, during the burning process. We show that nicotelline metabolites can be measured in the urine of smokers and that nicotelline can be measured in house dust from homes of smokers and nonsmokers. We conclude that nicotelline should be useful as a tracer and biomarker for PM derived from tobacco smoke.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available