4.5 Article

Modification of Keap1 Cysteine Residues by Sulforaphane

Journal

CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 515-521

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/tx100389r

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [P01 CA48112]
  2. Office of Dietary Supplements [P50 AT000155]
  3. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine
  4. The Chicago Community Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Activation of the transcription factor NF-E2-related factor-2 (Nrf2) through modification of Ketch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1) cysteines, leading to up-regulation of the antioxidant response element (ARE), is an important mechanism of cellular defense against reactive oxygen species and xenobiotic electrophiles. Sulforaphane, occurring in cruciferous vegetables such as broccoli, is a potent natural ARE activator that functions by modifying Keap1 cysteine residues, but there are conflicting in vitro and in vivo data regarding which of these cysteine residues react. Although most biological data indicate that modification of C151 is essential for sulforaphane action, some recent studies using mass spectrometry have failed to identify C151 as a site of Keap1 sulforaphane reaction. We have reconciled these conflicting data using mass spectrometry with a revised sample preparation protocol and confirmed that C151 is indeed among the most readily modified cysteines of Keap1 by sulforaphane. Previous mass spectrometry-based studies used iodoacetamide during sample preparation to derivatize free cysteine sulfhydryl groups causing the loss of sulforaphane from highly reactive and reversible cysteine residues on Keap1 including C151. By omitting iodoacetamide from the protocol and reducing sample preparation time, our mass spectrometry-based studies now confirm previous cell-based studies which showed that sulforaphane reacts with at least four cysteine residues of Keap1 including C151.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available