4.5 Article

An Update on Direct Genotoxicity as a Molecular Mechanism of Ochratoxin A Carcinogenicity

Journal

CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages 252-262

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/tx200430f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Union [QLK1-2001-01614]
  2. Region Midi-Pyrenees
  3. French Ministry of Research
  4. Association pour la recherche contre le cancer (ARC)
  5. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  6. Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  7. Ontario Innovation Trust (OIT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ochratoxin A (OTA) is a naturally occurring chlorophenolic fungal toxin that contaminates a wide range of food products and poses a cancer threat to humans. The mechanism of action (MOA) for OTA renal carcinogenicity is a controversial issue. In 2005, direct genotoxicity (covalent DNA adduct formation) was proposed as a MOA for OTA-mediated carcinogenicity [Manderville, R. A. (2005) Chem. Res. Toxicol. 18, 1091-1097]. At that time, inconsistent results had been published on OTA genotoxicity/mutagenicity, and conclusive evidence for OTA-mediated DNA adduction had been lacking. In this update, published data from the past 6-7 years are presented that provide new hypotheses for the MOA of OTA-mediated carcinogenicity. While direct genotoxicity remains a controversial issue for OTA, new findings from the Umemura and Nohmi laboratories provide definitive results for the mutagenicity of OTA in the target tissue (outer medulla) of male rat kidney that rules out oxidative DNA damage. These findings, coupled with our own efforts that provide new structural evidence for DNA adduction by OTA, has strengthened the argument for involvement of direct genotoxicity in OTA-mediated renal carcinogenesis. This MOA should be taken into consideration for OTA human risk assessment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available