4.7 Article

Toxicity assessment of ionic liquids with Vibrio fischeri: An alternative fully automated methodology

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 284, Issue -, Pages 136-142

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.10.049

Keywords

Ionic liquids; Vibrio fischeri; Automated SIA system; Microplate

Funding

  1. National Funds (FCT, Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia) [Pest-C/EQB/LA0006/2013]
  2. European Union (FEDER funds) [NORTE-07-0124-FEDER-000067]
  3. FCT [SFRH/BD/86381/2012]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/86381/2012] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A fully automated Vibrio fischeri methodology based on sequential injection analysis (SIA) has been developed. The methodology was based on the aspiration of 75 mu L of bacteria and 50 mu L of inhibitor followed by measurement of the luminescence of bacteria. The assays were conducted for contact times of 5, 15, and 30 min, by means of three mixing chambers that ensured adequate mixing conditions. The optimized methodology provided a precise control of the reaction conditions which is an asset for the analysis of a large number of samples. The developed methodology was applied to the evaluation of the impact of a set of ionic liquids (ILs) on V. fischeri and the results were compared with those provided by a conventional assay kit (Biotox (R)). The collected data evidenced the influence of different cation head groups and anion moieties on the toxicity of ILs. Generally, aromatic cations and fluorine-containing anions displayed higher impact on V. fischeri, evidenced by lower EC50. The proposed methodology was validated through statistical analysis which demonstrated a strong positive correlation (P>0.98) between assays. It is expected that the automated methodology can be tested for more classes of compounds and used as alternative to microplate based V. fischeri assay kits. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available