4.7 Article

Aluminum-in-olivine thermometry of primitive basalts: Evidence of an anomalously hot mantle source for large igneous provinces

Journal

CHEMICAL GEOLOGY
Volume 368, Issue -, Pages 1-10

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2014.01.004

Keywords

Olivine; Thermometer; Plume

Funding

  1. NSERC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The maximum crystallization temperature of mantle-derived melts provides constraints on the minimum temperature of their mantle source regions. This temperature can be estimated using phenocryst-based thermometry on primitive lavas that contain olivine and spinel phenocrysts using the Al-in-olivine thermometer. Application of an updated version of this thermometer to primitive basalts gives precise estimates of olivine-spinel crystallization temperatures in different geodynamic settings. These are minimum temperatures for melt extraction from the mantle due to both adiabatic cooling and cooling prior to co-saturation in these phases. Application of this thermometer to primitive MORB gives co-saturation temperatures of up to 1270 degrees C (and a maximum olivine forsterite (Fo) content of Fo(91.3)) consistent with previous constraints (e. g. from the volume of melt produced at mid-ocean ridges). Substantially higher crystallization temperatures are recorded by Tertiary (similar to 60 Ma) picrites from Baffin Island (up to 1408 degrees C; Fo(91.3)) and East Greenland (up to 1354 degrees C; Fo(90.1)), Cretaceous (86 Ma) picrites from Madagascar (up to 1486 degrees C; Fo(91.8)) and Cretaceous (88 Ma) komatiites from Gorgona (up to 1435 degrees C; Fo(91.7)). Unlike olivine-melt based thermometers these temperature estimates are not significantly influenced by uncertainty in melt H2O content or fO(2). These results indicate that the mantle source region of large igneous provinces is substantially hotter than the ambient upper mantle, supporting the standard thermal plume model. (C) 2014 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available