4.7 Article

Influence of radiation damage on Late Jurassic zircon from southern China: Evidence from in situ measurements of oxygen isotopes, laser Raman, U-Pb ages, and trace elements

Journal

CHEMICAL GEOLOGY
Volume 389, Issue -, Pages 122-136

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2014.09.013

Keywords

Radiation damage; Zircon; Oxygen isotopes; U-Pb ages; Laser Raman; SIMS

Funding

  1. 973 Project of China [2012CB416701]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41222016]
  3. U.S. National Science Foundation [EAR-0319230, 0744079, 1053466]
  4. Directorate For Geosciences
  5. Division Of Earth Sciences [1053466, 1144454] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Earth Sciences
  7. Directorate For Geosciences [1355590] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The influence of radiation damage on chemical alteration and in situ elemental and isotopic analyses in zircons is evaluated in three similar to 155 Ma granites that are associated with W-Sn polymetallic deposits in the Nanling area of southern China. A combined approach is described using SEM imaging, laser Raman spectroscopy, and ion microprobe analysis of oxygen isotope ratios, U-Pb ages, and trace elements, including H. Domains within single zircons can be classified into two groups based on cathodoluminescence (CL) intensity and U-Th concentrations. Type-I are single crystals or clearly defined cores with bright CL, having U < 1400 ppm and Th < 800 ppm; type-II are rims surrounding type-I cores or single crystals with dark or intermediate CL-intensity and have 2100-30,000 ppm U and 900-6500 ppm Th. Both types of zircon display oscillatory zonation. Type-I zircons show a narrow range of delta O-18(zircon) values (8.5-9.2 parts per thousand), while type-II zircons have much greater variation of apparent delta O-18(zircon) values (1.4-8.6 parts per thousand). Relative to type-I, type-II zircons are characterized by elevated trace-element concentrations (including U, Th, rare earth elements, Y, Hf, Fe and Ti, La-N > 10), high cumulative alpha-dose and background-corrected (OH)-O-16/O-16, decreased Th/U and Hf/Yb ratios, and deviation in Pb-206/U-238 ages (up to 70Ma) from the mean age (ca. 155 Ma) of type-I zircons. Moreover, laser Raman results show that type-II zircons have much broader FWHM (full width half maximum = 6.3-37.8 cm(-1)) and decreased amplitudes for the similar to 1005 cm(-1) Raman peak, indicating that they are affected by significant radiation damage. The Raman-measured preserved radiation damage (D-alpha(P) = 0.01-0.49 x 10(15) alpha-decay events/mg) is less than the total alpha-dose (D-alpha(T) = 0.1-1.72 x 10(15) alpha-decay events/mg) for each zircon of type-I and type-II with FWHM < 10 cm(-1), indicating that 30-80% of the total radiation damage experienced by most of these zircons has been annealed. We attribute the negative correlation of delta O-18 versus U, Th, Y, Hf, La and cumulative alpha-dose for type-II zircons to open-system behavior resulting from radiation damage of the zircon crystal structure. We interpret type-II zircons to originally represent crystallization from a late-stage granite melt that was enriched in magmatic fluids and incompatible elements. The wide range and low delta O-18 values recorded by most type-II zircon domains are the result of secondary alteration by fluids (perhaps hydrothermal) facilitated by radiation damage and open system chemical and isotopic exchange. This work shows that a combined approach using imaging, laser Raman and trace element analysis is effective for evaluating the influence of radiation damage and alteration of zircon. This protocol is necessary to evaluate the reliability of in situ oxygen isotopic and U-Pb ages. The (OH)-O-16/O-16 ratio is readily measured during SIMS analysis of oxygen isotopes and can be an effective parameter to monitor alteration of radiation-damaged domains in zircon. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available