4.7 Article

Deconvolving episodic age spectra from zircons of the Ladakh Batholith, northwest Indian Himalaya

Journal

CHEMICAL GEOLOGY
Volume 289, Issue 3-4, Pages 179-196

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2011.07.024

Keywords

SHRIMP; Geochronology; Trans-Himalaya; Episodic; Granite; Zircon

Funding

  1. Research School of Earth Sciences
  2. Australian Postgraduate Award (APA)
  3. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DP0877274]
  4. Australian Research Council [DP0877274] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present U/Pb SHRIMP dates of zircons from 7 key samples of the Ladakh Batholith to reconcile the many, often conflicting ages that have been proposed according to various geochronological techniques. Various crosscutting magmatic phases were dated to determine the age of granitoid emplacement. Our results indicate that granitoid emplacement occurred between 66 Ma and 46 Ma. The final phase of magmatism is characterized by the emplacement of crosscutting fine-grained granite (leucogranite), and pegmatite near the village of Chumatang. These dykes are defined as I-type granitoids according to their mineralogy. This indicates that I-type magmatism in the Ladakh Batholith continued until at least similar to 46 Ma. This implies either that India had not accreted to Eurasia by 46 Ma, or that one of the widely used geological criteria to define the timing of India-Asia collision is incorrect. In addition, SHRIMP analyses of metamorphic zircon rims yield ages between 20 and 10 Ma. These ages may relate to the exhumation of the batholith or to metamorphic activity after exhumation. Evidence of metamorphic zircon growth between 20 and 10 Ma may provide an explanation for many of the similar ages obtained from geochronometers that are affected or reset by temperatures lower than those expected for zircon (e.g. K/Ar and (40)Ar/(39)Ar dating of mica). (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available