4.7 Review

Halogens in igneous processes and their fluxes to the atmosphere and oceans from volcanic activity: A review

Journal

CHEMICAL GEOLOGY
Volume 263, Issue 1-4, Pages 110-121

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.11.013

Keywords

Volcanic degassing; Halogen geochemistry; Subduction-zone magmatism

Funding

  1. Leverhulme Trust
  2. Natural Environment Research Council UK
  3. Royal Society
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/C511180/2, come20001, earth010007] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. NERC [come20001] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The halogens (F, Cl, Br, I) form an important suite of tracers of igneous processes. and may be used to track magmas from their point of origin, through their differentiation, evolution, saturation in vapour and escape to the Earth's atmosphere and hydrosphere. This review summarises the current state of the field, starting with an analysis of what is, and what is not, known about the distribution of halogens in Earth's interior reservoirs, and the principal controls on their behaviour during partial melting, crystallisation and degassing. With recent advances in measurement techniques, there is now a new opportunity to improve the inventories of halogen emissions from the open-vent, continuously-degassing systems that dominate the background contribution of volcanoes to the atmosphere. The different approaches to estimating the fluxes of HCl and HF to the atmosphere from arc and global volcanism are converging, and can now be used to place important constraints on the global cycling of halogens through subduction-zone systems. Arc-related volcanic emissions of halogens dominate the global halogen degassing budgets. Our current best estimates of halogen degassing fluxes from arc volcanoes are 4.3 (+/- 1) Tg/a (HCl), 0.5 (+/- 0.2) Tg/a (HF), 5-15 Gg/a (HBr) and 0.5-2 Gg/a (HI). (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available