4.7 Article

Controls on the metal compositions of magmatic sulfide deposits in the Emeishan large igneous province, SW China

Journal

CHEMICAL GEOLOGY
Volume 253, Issue 1-2, Pages 38-49

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.04.005

Keywords

magmatic sulfide deposit; Emeishan large igneous province; multiple removal of sulfide liquid; R-factors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magmatic sulfide deposits in the Emeishan large igneous province, SW China, have variable chalcophile and siderophile metal contents and can be divided into PGE, Ni-Cu-PGE and Ni-Cu deposits. PGE sulfide deposits include the Jinbaoshan and Zhubu deposits and have ores with very low sulfide contents (similar to 1 to 2 vol.%) and very high Pt and Pd (0.3 to 10 ppm) and Ir (0.02 to 0.5 ppm). Typical Ni-Cu-PGE sulfide deposits include the Yangliuping and Qingkuangshan deposits, which contain sulfide ores with more than 10 vol.% sulfides (0.1-6.2 wt.% Ni, 0.03-11 wt.% Cu) and have moderate PGE contents (0.1-5 ppm Pt, 0.01 -1.8 ppm, Pd, <0.5 ppm Ir). The Ni-Cu sulfide deposits, such as the Limahe and Baimazhai deposits, have sulfide-rich ores with more than 10 vol.% sulfides (0.1-4 wt.% Ni, 0.02-6.5 wt.% Cu) and are extremely poor in PGE (<0.2 ppm Pt and <03 ppm Pd, <0.007 ppm Ir). Silicate rocks from the hosting intrusions of these three types of deposits have distinctive PGE concentrations. On the 100% sulfide basis, Pt and Pd correlate positively with It in the ores from the PGE deposits, whereas they correlate negatively in the Ni-Cu-PGE and Ni-Cu deposits. PGE geochemistry and model calculations indicate that the PGE-rich sulfides were separated from primary basaltic magmas, whereas the Ni-Cu-PGE sulfides were produced from magmas that had experienced minor sulfide removal (about 0.01%), and the Ni-Cu sulfides were separated from magmas that experienced about 0.025% sulfide segregation. Fractionation of monosulfide solid solution resulted in differentiation between IPGE and PPGE in the Ni-Cu-PGE and Ni-Cu deposits. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available