4.7 Article

Rheological properties of magma from the 1538 eruption of Monte Nuovo (Phlegrean Fields, Italy): An experimental study

Journal

CHEMICAL GEOLOGY
Volume 256, Issue 3-4, Pages 158-171

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.06.035

Keywords

Magma rheology; Shear thinning; Shear weakening; Eruption dynamics

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [200021-103845, 200020-111852]
  2. Italian Dipartimento della Protezione Civile
  3. Istituto Nazionale Geofisica e Vulcanologia INGV [V3-2/UR17]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rheology of natural, partially crystallized samples from Monte Nuovo (1538 AD) eruption have been investigated Using a high temperature, high pressure internally heated pressure vessel. Within the temperature interval of investigation the samples exhibited Newtonian theology at deformation strain rates up to 10(-4) s(-1). At higher strain rates a decrease of viscosity with increasing strain rate (shear thinning), eventually terminating in a sudden viscosity drop (stress weakening), was observed. Stress weakening occurred at higher applied strain rates and stresses with increasing temperature. The microstructural analyses of the samples revealed that stress weakening resulted from strain localization, which occurred in brittle and viscous regimes at the lowest and highest temperatures investigated respectively. The different rheological behaviors of the investigated material is likely responsible for the changes in the dynamics of magma ascent within the volcanic conduit during the eruption of Monte Nuovo volcano. We infer that the occurrence of syn-eruptive decompression driven crystallization, observed in previous studies, induced strong variations in the rheological properties of magma, which in turn was responsible for the changes of eruptive style observed during the Monte Nuovo eruption. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available