4.6 Article

Multi-stage energy analysis of steam explosion process

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
Volume 116, Issue -, Pages 254-262

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2014.05.012

Keywords

Steam explosion; Energy consumption; Heat transfer; Process control

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Project) [2011CB707401]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Pro-gram (863 Program) [SS2012AA022502]
  3. National Key Project of Scientific and Technical Supporting Program of China [2011BAD22B02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Owing to the deficiency of investigating steam explosion on energy utilization, in this study, we analyze the heat transfer mechanism and energy consumption of steam explosion process. Based on years of research, we propose that energy consumption of steam explosion not only involves holding pressure and instantaneous decompression stages but also the upward stage of pressure. On this basis, a multi-stage heat transfer model of steam explosion process integrating technical features is established. Results reveal the significance of pressure boost stage which contributes the vast majority of total energy consumption. The amount of steam consumption per unit mass of dry materials m' is presented to quantitatively evaluate the energy consumption under various factors, in which initial moisture content is considered as the most important factor. Several rational operational strategies for improving energy efficiency are proposed including controlling low moisture content of materials (< 40%), adopting low-temperature and long-time parameters as well as properly reducing particle size. Such representations not only contribute to utilization of energy but considerably facilitate optimization, simulation, design and control of steam explosion process, consequently improving the large-scale deployment of steam explosion technology. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available