4.6 Article

Reaction Engineering Approach (REA) to model the drying kinetics of droplets with different initial sizes-experiments and analyses

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
Volume 66, Issue 8, Pages 1738-1747

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2011.01.009

Keywords

Drying; Mass transfer; Reaction Engineering Approach (REA); Droplet drying kinetics; Glass filament gravimetric method; Diameter change

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Droplets with different initial sizes, which are typical in conventional liquid atomization for spray drying applications, will result in varying drying and crust formation histories. It is essential for any droplet drying model to accurately capture such fundamental phenomena. This study used a newly constructed glass-filament single droplet rig to evaluate the applicability of the Reaction Engineering Approach (REA) in describing such effect. For the three initial sizes (1,2 and 3 mu L) tested, the glass filament gravimetric method clearly distinguished the different drying kinetics and the crust formation phenomenon, delineated by the drying behavior. Analysis from the drying kinetics revealed that the main premise of the REA, which utilizes a material-specific master activation energy curve, is applicable to droplets of different initial sizes at all the three air temperatures tested. This allowed the REA to accurately predict the different temperature and moisture histories given by droplets with different initial sizes. The result supports the REA as a good modeling approach for a wide range of initial droplet conditions. A new master curve approach was proposed to predict the diameter change of droplets with different initial concentrations. Validation with the current and past experimental data revealed that this approach has strong potential to account for the different feed concentrations typically found in spray drying applications. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available