4.6 Article

Analytical expressions for predicting permeability of bimodal fibrous porous media

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
Volume 64, Issue 6, Pages 1154-1159

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2008.11.013

Keywords

Bimodal media; Permeability modeling; Fibrous media; Filters

Funding

  1. Nonwovens Cooperative Research Center (NCRC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pressure drop is one of the most important characteristics of a fibrous media. While numerous analytical, numerical, and experimental published works are available for predicting the permeability of media made up of fibers with a unimodal fiber diameter distribution (referred to as unimodal media here), there are almost no easy-to-use expressions available for media with a bimodal fiber diameter distribution (referred to as bimodal media). In the present work, the permeability of bimodal media is calculated by solving the Stokes flow governing equations in a series of 3-D virtual geometries that mimic the microstructure of fibrous materials. These simulations are designed to establish a unimodal equivalent diameter for the bimodal media thereby taking advantage of the existing expressions of unimodal materials for permeability prediction. We evaluated eight different methods of defining an equivalent diameter for bimodal media and concluded that the area-weighted average diameter of Brown and Thorpe [2001. Glass-fiber filters with bimodal fiber size distributions. Powder Technology 118, 3-9], volume-weighted resistivity model of Clague and Phillips [1997. A numerical calculation of the hydraulic permeability of three dimensional disordered fibrous media. Physics of Fluids 9 (6). 1562-1572], and the cube root relation of the current paper offer the best predictions for the entire range of mass (number) fractions, 0 <= n(c)<= 1, with fiber diameter ratios, 1 <= R(cf)<= 5, and soliclities, 5 <=alpha <= 15. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available