4.6 Article

Flow separation from a spherical particle in supercritical water

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN
Volume 92, Issue 11, Pages 2273-2282

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2014.03.007

Keywords

Flow separation; Spherical particle; Fluidized bed; Supercritical water; Variable property; Mixed convection

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51322606]
  2. National Excellent 100 Doctoral Dissertation [201151]
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-10-0678]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flow separation from a spherical particle in supercritical water (SCW) is the basic flow structure in supercritical water fluidized bed (SCWFB). In order to study flow separation from a spherical particle in SCW in detail, a numerical model fully accounting for variations in thermo-physical properties has been developed in the pseudo-critical zone. Flow separation parameters (separation angle, length of wake vortex, width of wake vortex, and drag coefficient) for forced convection, assisting convection, and opposing convection have been obtained at intermediate Reynolds numbers. Results show that variable viscosity has a remarkable effect on flow separation, and the decreasing viscosity results in higher velocity gradient around the sphere particle surface and a larger wake vortex on the rear particle surface. A simple expression of Cd/Cd-c = (mu(w)/mu(f))(0.15) is achieved to predicate the drag coefficient of the SCW flow with mu(w)/mu(f) between 0.7 and 1.0. Free convection inhibits the flow separation of the assisting convection, but enhances the flow separation of the opposing convection. Three flow separation zones (the rear-end separation zone, the transition zone, and the reversed flow zone) are observed for the opposing convection. (C) 2014 The Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available