4.6 Article

Adsorption capacity and removal efficiency of heavy metal ions by Moso and Ma bamboo activated carbons

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN
Volume 90, Issue 9, Pages 1397-1406

Publisher

INST CHEMICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2011.11.020

Keywords

Bamboo; Activated carbon; Adsorption capacity; Removal efficiency; Heavy metal ion

Funding

  1. Forestry Bureau, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, Taiwan, R.O.C. [96AS-7.2.2-FB-e2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to understand the adsorption capacity and removal efficiency of heavy metal ions by Moso and Ma bamboo activated carbons, the carbon yield, specific surface area, micropore area, zeta potential, and the effects of pH value, soaking time and dosage of bamboo activated carbon were investigated in this study. In comparison with once-activated bamboo carbons, lower carbon yields, larger specific surface area and micropore volume were found for the twice-activated bamboo carbons. The optimum pH values for adsorption capacity and removal efficiency of heavy metal ions were 5.81-7.86 and 7.10-9.82 by Moso and Ma bamboo activated carbons, respectively. The optimum soaking time was 2-4 h for Pb2+, 4-8 h for Cu2+ and Cd2+, and 4 h for Cr3+. by Moso bamboo activated carbons, and 1 h for the tested heavy metal ions by Ma bamboo activated carbons. The adsorption capacity and removal efficiency of heavy metal ions of the various bamboo activated carbons decreased in the order: twice-activated Ma bamboo carbons > once-activated Ma bamboo carbons > twice-activated Moso bamboo carbons > once-activated Moso bamboo carbons. The Ma bamboo activated carbons had a lower zeta potential and effectively attracted positively charged metal ions. The removal efficiency of heavy metal ions by the various bamboo activated carbons decreased in the order: Pb2+ > Cu2+ > Cr3+ >Cd2+. (C) 2011 The Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available