4.6 Article

Amine modified mesocellular siliceous foam (MCF) as a sorbent for CO2

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN
Volume 89, Issue 9, Pages 1647-1657

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2011.02.019

Keywords

Polyethyleneimine; Mesocellular siliceous foam; CO2 adsorption; Vacuum swing adsorption

Funding

  1. Australian Government through AusAID
  2. CRC Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adsorption is considered a promising method for carbon capture. CO2 adsorbents take a variety of forms - but one approach is to fill mesoporous substrates with a polymeric CO2 selective sorbent. SBA-15 and mesocellular siliceous foam (MCF) are high pore volume, high surface area ordered mesoporous materials for which modification with amine should result in high capacity, highly selective adsorbents. SBA-15 and MCF were separately loaded with approximately one pore volume equivalent of linear polyethyleneimine (PEI) (My, =2500) or branched PEI (M-W = 1200). CO2 adsorption/desorption isotherms under dry CO2 were obtained at 75, 105 and 115 degrees C. The CO2 adsorption/desorption kinetics were improved with temperature, though the CO2 capacities generally decreased. The adsorption capacity for MCF loaded with branched PEI at 105 and 115 degrees C were 151 and 133 mg/g adsorbent, respectively (in 50% CO2/Ar, 20 min adsorption time). These are significantly higher than the adsorption capacity observed for SBA-15 loaded with branched PEI under same conditions, which were 107 and 83 mg/g adsorbent, respectively. Thus the results indicate that, on a unit mass basis, amine modified MCF's are potentially better adsorbents than amine modified SBA-15 for CO2 capture at modestly elevated temperature in a vacuum swing adsorption process. Crown Copyright (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of The Institution of Chemical Engineers. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available