Journal
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN
Volume 89, Issue 9, Pages 1625-1638Publisher
INST CHEMICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2010.09.010
Keywords
Post-combustion CO2 capture; Carbon capture; Coal fired power plants; Greenhouse gas mitigation
Categories
Funding
- Australian Government through the Asia Pacific Partnership (APP) on Clean Development and Climate
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Australian power generators produce approximately 170 TWh per annum of electricity using black and brown coals that accounts for 170 Mtonne of CO2 emissions per annum or over 40% of anthropogenic CO2 emissions in Australia. This paper describes the results of a techno-economic evaluation of liquid absorption based post-combustion capture (PCC) processes for both existing and new pulverised coal-fired power stations in Australia. The overall process designs incorporate both the case with continuous capture and the case with the flexibility to switch a CO2 capture plant on or off depending upon the demand and market price for electricity, and addresses the impact of the presently limited emission controls on the process cost. The techno-economic evaluation includes both air and water cooled power and CO2 capture plants, resulting in cost of power generation for the situations without and with PCC. Whilst existing power plants in Australia are all water cooled sub-critical designs, the new power plants are deemed to range from supercritical single reheat to ultra-supercritical double reheat designs, with a preference for air-cooling. The process evaluation also includes a detailed sensitivity analysis of the thermodynamic properties of liquid absorbent for CO2 on the overall costs. The results show that for a meaningful decrease in the efficiency and cost penalties associated with the post combustion CO2 capture, a novel liquid sorbent will need to have heat of absorption/desorption, sensible heat and heat of vaporisation around 50% less in comparison with 30% (w/w) aqueous MEA solvent. It also shows that the impact of the capital costs of FCC processes is quite large on the added cost of generation. The results can be used to prioritise PCC research in an Australian context. (C) 2010 The Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available