4.7 Article

The effect of contaminants on the application of polyamine functionalised ion exchange resins for uranium extraction from sulfate based mining process waters

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 354, Issue -, Pages 633-640

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.07.209

Keywords

Uranium; Polyamine; Ion exchange; Saline; Weak base; S985

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G037140/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three in-house produced polyamine functionalised ion exchange resins and Purolite S985 (a commercial ion exchange resin) have been assessed for their ability to extract UO22+ from a variety of aqueous matrices applicable to current and potential future uranium mining processes. The uptake of common contaminant species in uranium processing liquors at variable acid concentrations has been assessed, with Al3+ and MoO42- showing the most extraction, with AsO43-, Eu3+ and Fe3+ showing extractions> 10% at low [H+]. Extraction of MoO42-, AsO43-, Eu3+ and Fe3+ was seen to decrease with increasing [H+]. The impact of increasing [Cl-] on UO22+ and Fe3+ extraction has been determined. Fe3+ showed low extractions by all resins, with no dependence on [Cl-]. In contrast, increasing suppression of UO22+ uptake was seen with increasing [Cl-] up to 80g L-1, with extraction remaining constant beyond this [Cl-]. At high [Cl-] (> 50 g L-1) Purolite S985 was seen to remove UO22+ from solution more effectively than all synthesised polyamine resins. The presence of Fe3+ in solution was seen to suppress UO22+ uptake by around 10% when [Fe3+]/[UO22+] increased from 0 to 2. Fe3+ extraction by all studied resins was promoted by the presence of UO22+ in solution. This was most prevalent with Purolite S985, with an extraction of 30% for [Fe3+]/[UO22+] = 2 by Purolite S985. All resins were tested using a process water from a uranium mine and have shown an ability to selectively extract UO22+ from such solutions, with the best synthetic resin recovering 15.7% more uranium than Purolite S985.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available