4.7 Article

Stability of Fe-C micro-electrolysis and biological process in treating ultra-high concentration organic wastewater

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 255, Issue -, Pages 535-540

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.05.138

Keywords

Ultra-high concentration; Organic wastewater; Fe-C micro-electrolysis; Hydrolysis acidification; Bio-contact oxidation

Funding

  1. China National Petroleum Corporation, China [2008D-4707]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three kinds of industrial wastewater were treated using combined Fe-C micro-electrolysis (FCME), hydrolysis acidification (HA), and bio-contact oxidation (BCO) processes. Two waste streams were characterized as ultra-high concentration of organic wastewater (UHCOW, more than 150,000 mg/L of CODcr). The other stream called clean water (CW), was a mixture of lower-concentration industrial wastewater and office block sewage. Efficiency and stability of the combined system were investigated in a pilot-scale experiment. The combined system can be operated normally under most suitable conditions, but its operation stability is poor. With increasing the ratio of UHCOW/CW, activated carbon in the FCME tank and carriers in the HA tank are fouled by oil droplets and lose certain functions gradually after 10 days of operation. As a result, COD, removal efficiency decreased, particularly in the FCME tank. Moreover, the highly concentrated contaminants will severely restrict the growth of the microorganism in BCO tanks. The method of adding CW primarily functions in determining the system's stability. At UHCOW/CW ratio of 1:10, the system showed higher stability after changing the manner of adding CW. Interestingly, the COD of the wastewater can still be reduced from more than 150,000 mg/L to similar to 500 mg/L upon increasing the quantity or quality of the UHCOW by 30% in the shock test. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available