4.7 Article

Effects of UV radiation on humic acid coagulation characteristics in drinking water treatment processes

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 256, Issue -, Pages 137-143

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.06.113

Keywords

Coagulation; Drinking water; Humic acid; UV light radiation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21007050]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20106120120014]
  3. Science and Technology Nova Program of Shaanxi [2014KJXX-66]
  4. open funds of Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Science and Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Humic acid (HA) commonly exists in natural waters and drinking water treatment processes. The effects of UV light radiation on the coagulation of HA were investigated in this paper. It was determined that UV light radiation could effectively improve the removal of HA at pH above 6.0. The concentration of residual HA in the coagulated water was in the range of 1.5-3.0 mg/L, which was significantly lower compared to that without pretreatment. However, in waters tested with pH below 5.5, the UV light radiation showed an adverse effect on HA removal using coagulation, which might be connected to its high oxidation function under acidic conditions. The zeta potential of the HA solution with UV light radiation was approximately 10 my higher compared to that without pretreatment at pH above 6.0; while its apparent diameters and heights increased from less than 130 nm and 0.5-3.5 nm to 100-240 nm and 1.0-4.5 nm respectively, after 2.0 h of UV light radiation as the aggregation of HA. The compressed double electric layer caused by the formation of positive charged sites after UV light radiation was considered to be the primary factor that led to the enhanced removal of HA in the following coagulation process. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available