4.7 Article

In situ IR spectroscopic study to reveal the impact of the synthesis conditions of zeolite β nanoparticles on the acidic properties of the resulting zeolite

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 237, Issue -, Pages 372-379

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.10.041

Keywords

Zeolite beta; Zeolite nanoparticles; Acidity; In situ FT-IR

Funding

  1. Fund for Scientific Research-Flanders
  2. National Science Centre, Poland [2011/01/B/ST5/00915]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Zeolite beta has been synthesised by hydrothermally ageing zeolite beta nanoparticles. The influence of a small variation in the synthesis conditions of the zeolite nanoparticles solution, i.e. a hydrothermal synthesis temperature of 373 K versus 423 K, on the structural and acidic properties is examined. The structural characteristics, as determined via N-2-sorption, DRIFT, XRD and SEM, do not show clear discrepancies. However, an extensive study of the aluminium coordination ((27)AI MAS NMR) and the acidic characteristics (in situ FT-IR with NH3 and CO as probe) reveal a difference between the two nanoparticles based zeolites. Although both zeolites exhibit a similar total acid site concentration, a clear impact of the synthesis temperature on the protonic bridging hydroxyls (Si(OH)AI) concentration has been detected. Hence, even though both nanoparticles solutions have been submitted to a further hydrothermal synthesis period of several days, the differences induced by the variation in temperature during the formation of the nanoparticles (first 2411) remain in the final structure. This knowledge not only allows the tailoring of the material characteristics of the full-grown zeolites, but also reveals important aspects to be taken into account in le. the up-scaling of zeolite synthesis for catalytic applications, in which the acidity characteristics play a key role. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available