4.7 Article

Mixing and temperature effects on the kinetics of alkali metal catalyzed, ionic liquid based batch conversion of cellulose to fuel products

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 240, Issue -, Pages 109-115

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.11.060

Keywords

Cellulose; Biofuel; Catalytic conversion; Ionic liquid; Glucose; Mass transfer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper explores the effects of mixing and temperature on ionic liquid-based catalytic conversion of cellulose to fuel products and suggests the optimal mixing speed and temperature for maximizing the production of cellulosic fuels. We perform a tightly-coupled experimental-modeling study to quantify the effects of mixing (150-1200 rpm) and temperature (120-160 degrees C) on the kinetics of batch conversion of cellulose (Avicel) to glucose and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) using alkali metal (CuCl2) catalysts in ionic liquid ([Bmim]Cl) medium. While glucose could be fermented to produce bioethanol, HMF can be selectively hydrogenated to produce a gasoline derivative 2,5-dimethylfuran (DMF), which, post-treatment, can be used as gasoline. The algebraic expressions we obtain allow us to quantify the variation of the kinetic constants with mixing speed from the mass-transfer limited asymptote through the intermediate regime to the reaction limited regime. We identify the rate-limiting step in the three-step reaction network and recommend 700 rpm or above (in the reaction limited regime) and 120 degrees C as the optimum mixing speed and temperature, respectively, which eliminate mass transfer resistances from the system and maximize glucose and HMF yields while minimizing energy expenditure. We report very significant increase in glucose and HMF yields when these batch reactions in series are conducted in the reaction limited regime rather than in the mass-transfer limited regime. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available