4.7 Article

Waste lubricating oil treatment by extraction and adsorption

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 220, Issue -, Pages 343-351

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.12.076

Keywords

Waste lubricating oil; Purification; Extraction; Adsorption

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, the recovery of base oils from waste lubricants was investigated using a novel combination of solvent extraction and adsorption on solids. The performance of six extracting solvents (n-hexane, 1-butanol, petroleum ether, 1-hexanol, carbon tetra chloride, and acetone) was evaluated experimentally. Solvent to oil ratios from 1:1 to 4:1 were also examined. This research has studied the effect of the use of KOH to enhance flocculation. The results show that 1-butanol achieved the best performance with the maximum percent sludge removal, followed by n-hexane, petroleum ether, 1-hexanol, carbon tetrachloride, and acetone. The percentage of oil sludge was found to increase with the increase of solvent to oil ratio until it reached the maximum at the ratio of 3:1. The application of an adsorption process using different adsorbent materials was investigated. Adsorbent materials such as almond shell, walnut shell, eggshell, and acid activated clay which were prepared locally were used. It was found that the acid activated clay was able to give the best conditions for treating the waste oil followed by the almond shell powder. The results from the test showed that, viscosity increased from 38.3 cst for used lube oil to 85 cst for acid/clay treatment and the flash point increase from 178 degrees C to 238 degrees C, while the density decreased from 912 to 896 kg/m(3), the pour point from -6 to -13.2 degrees C and colour from 0.53 to 0.12. Other results from the different tests showed varying degrees of improvement with the best results obtained using the acid/clay treatment. (C) 2013 Elsevier By. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available