4.7 Article

Coarse grid simulation of heterogeneous gas-solid flow in a CFB riser with polydisperse particles

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 234, Issue -, Pages 173-183

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.08.108

Keywords

Multiphase flow; Population balance model; Fluidization; Meso-scale structure; EMMS drag model; Particle polydispersity

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21206170]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA07080200]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Industrial fluidized beds usually show a wide particle size distribution which significantly affects the performance of gas-solid two-phase reactors. However, in traditional CFD models the particle size distribution is often represented by the Sauter mean diameter no matter whether the distribution is wide or narrow, which cannot reflect the effects of the particle size distribution on its operation. In this study, a simplified population balance model (PBM) is combined with two-fluid model (TFM) and the Energy Minimization Multi-Scale (EMMS) drag model for simulating heterogeneous gas-solid flow. The EMMS drag model is used to characterize the effects of meso-scale clustering structures on the inter-phase drag force. The current model is compared with the model with the assumption of single particle diameter, and is used to study the segregation and mixing characteristics in a riser. It was shown that (i) for the specific cases we studied, particle polydispersity has a negligible effect on the time-averaged axial solid concentration profiles but has a notable effect on the particle velocity distributions, (ii) the experimental hydrodynamics as well as segregation and mixing patterns in a riser with a continuous particle size distribution can be predicted reasonably well by present combined TFM-EMMS-PBM method. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available