4.7 Article

Simultaneous removal of COD and Direct Red 80 in a mixed anaerobic sulfate-reducing bacteria culture

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 223, Issue -, Pages 611-616

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.03.031

Keywords

Direct Red 80; Sulfate reducing bacteria; Degradation; Anaerobic; Kinetic model

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [KRF-2008-313-D00554, 2010-0023442]
  3. Brain Korea 21 Program
  4. Priority Research Centers Program through an NRF
  5. MEST [2010-0028301]
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0023442] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The degradation, kinetics and biotransformation of Direct Red 80 and chemical oxygen demand (COD) were examined under a sulfate reducing environment. Complete color and sulfate removal with more than 87% COD removal were obtained in the batch experiments at different dye (50-800 mg/l) and sulfate (100-5000 mg/l) concentrations. Dye degradation, COD and sulfate removal followed first order kinetics. An increase in dye concentration from 0 to 800 mg L-1 decreased the rate constant (k(1)) for dye, COD and sulfate removal from 0.0843 to 0.035 h(-1), 0.019 to 0.009 h(-1) and 0.108 to 0.075 h(-1), respectively. In particular, the sulfate concentration had no significant effect on dye degradation. Unlike other anaerobic cultures, the sulfate-reducing bacteria culture showed excellent dye mineralization and desulfonation ability. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry revealed aniline and 1,4-diamino benzene to be the resulting metabolites after the decolorization of Direct Red 80. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available