4.3 Review

Plastic debris in the Laurentian Great Lakes: A review

Journal

JOURNAL OF GREAT LAKES RESEARCH
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages 9-19

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jglr.2014.12.020

Keywords

Laurentian Great Lakes; Plastic debris; Microplastics; Sources distribution and fate; Ecological and economic impacts; Research gaps

Funding

  1. Canada's Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario to Communitech Corporation's DATABASE program
  2. COM DEV International Ltd.
  3. exactEarth Ltd.
  4. Canada Excellence Research Chair (CERC) program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pollution by plastic debris is an increasing environmental concern in the Laurentian Great Lakes where it affects open-water, shoreline, and benthic environments. Open-water surveys reveal that in certain areas of the Great Lakes, surface water densities of plastics are as high as those reported for areas of litter accumulation within oceanic gyres. Data from volunteer beach cleanups show that typically more than 80% of anthropogenic litter along the shorelines of the Great Lakes is comprised of plastics. The distribution of plastics in bottom sediments of the Great Lakes is essentially unknown. Sources of plastic debris to the Great Lakes include microplastic beads from consumer products, pellets from the plastic manufacturing industry, and waste from beach-goers, shipping, and fishing activities. Many plastics degrade slowly in the environment and may have long-term adverse ecological and economic impacts, including the dispersal of persistent organic pollutants. Plans to combat and curtail plastic debris pollution in the Great Lakes will come at a significant economic cost, likely in excess of $400 million annually. Here, we review the current state of knowledge on plastic pollution in the Great Lakes, identify knowledge gaps, and suggest future research directions. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of International Association for Great Lakes Research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available