4.7 Article

Zero-valent copper nanoparticles for effective dechlorination of dichloromethane using sodium borohydride as a reductant

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 203, Issue -, Pages 95-100

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.07.002

Keywords

Catalytic degradation; Copper nanoparticles; Dichloromethane; Groundwater remediation; Pd/Fe bimetal; Zero-valent iron

Funding

  1. National Science Council of Taiwan [NSC 98-2221-E-002-040-MY3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dichloromethane (DCM) is a recalcitrant groundwater contaminant that shows nearly no reactivity with zero-valent iron (ZVI) nanoparticles. In this study, an effective dechlorination of DCM has been demonstrated using zero-valent copper (Cu-0) nanoparticles as a catalyst under sodium borohydride reduction conditions. The average diameter of Cu-0 nanoparticles was about 50 nm and the specific surface area was about 19 m(2) g(-1). Batch experiments revealed that 90% of DCM (26.4 mg L-1) was rapidly degraded within 1 h in the presence of Cu-0 nanoparticles (2.5 g L-1) and sodium borohydride (1 g L-1). The observed pseudo-first-order rate constant (k(obs)) was 2.19 h(-1), corresponding to a surface area normalized rate constant of 0.052 L m(-2) h(-1), which is 2-3 orders of magnitude higher than for other zero-valent metals. The DCM degradation rate is a function of the Cu-0 nanoparticle dose. Increasing the dose increased the observed reaction rate. Product analysis indicated that the degradation of DCM involved hydrodechlorination. Soluble copper ions generated by the dissolution of Cu-0 nanoparticles are lower than the World Health Organization drinking water standard, which suggests that the use of Cu-0 nanoparticles under reduction conditions may be potentially useful for the treatment of recalcitrant contaminants that are unable to be degraded by ZVI technology. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available