4.7 Article

Adsorption of arsenate from aqueous solution on binary mixed oxide of iron and silicon

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 192, Issue -, Pages 90-98

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.03.048

Keywords

Mixed oxide; Iron oxide; Silica; Arsenate; Adsorption model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper is related to the adsorption study of arsenate from aqueous solution onto the binary mixed oxide (MO) of iron and silicon in the ratio of 3:1, respectively. The adsorption affinity of arsenate toward various metal oxides/hydroxides was observed to be in the order: mixed oxide > iron hydroxide > iron oxide (nano particles) > iron oxide > silica. Arsenate concentration, pH, ionic strength of solution and thermal treatment of adsorbent were the main parameters investigated in this study for the removal of arsenate by mixed oxide. The decrease in arsenate adsorption with thermal treatment of the mixed oxide was assigned to decrease in surface area of the substrate with increase in its calcination temperature. Arsenate adsorption was found to increase with increase in ionic strength of background solution indicating the formation of inner-sphere complexes. The maximum desorption of arsenate back to the solution from the loaded surface was observed to be 73% at pH 12. Both the maximum adsorption capacity (X-m) and binding energy constant (K-b) values for mixed oxide (MO) calcined at different temperatures were in the order: MOuncalcined > MO300 degrees C > MO550 degrees C > MO750 degrees C. The dramatic decrease in the maximum adsorption capacity of mixed oxide calcined at 750 degrees C was linked to the phase transformation from amorphous to crystalline state. Energy dispersive X-ray (EDX), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and wet chemical analysis also confirmed the adsorption of arsenate by the mixed oxide of iron and silicon. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available