4.7 Article

Influence of effluent recirculation on the performance of Anammox process

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 200, Issue -, Pages 176-185

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.06.046

Keywords

Anammox; Effluent recirculation; Recirculation ratio; Shear force; Granular sludge

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50808060, 51078121]
  2. Project of Zhejiang Key Scientific and Technological Innovation Team [2010R50039]
  3. Program for Excellent Young Teachers in Hangzhou Normal University (HNUEYT) [JTAS 2011-01-020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A study employing two parallel, laboratory-scale upflow anaerobic sludge bed (UASB) reactors (R-1 without and R-2 with effluent recirculation) was performed to explore the impact of effluent recirculation with various recirculation ratios (r) on the performance of the anaerobic ammonium oxidation (Anammox) process. When the influent total nitrogen (TN) level was at 700 mg L-1, the nitrogen removal rate of R-2 (r = 0.5,4,5) was stable at approximately 3.5 kg m(-3) day(-1), which is higher than the value of 2.9 kg m(-3) day(-1) for R-1. This performance showed that the recirculation of effluent promoted the efficiency and stability of the Anammox process. The specific Anammox activity of the biomass in R-2 reached 13.3 mg-TN g(-1)-VSS h(-1), which is 34.3% higher than that in R-1. The dilution effect and the hydraulic shear force enhanced the performance of the Anammox reactor. However, effluent recirculation was prone to causing variation in the influent qualities. The variation in the substrate ratio did not significantly affect the stoichiometry of the Anammox reaction or the substrate removal capacity, but the high pH resulting from effluent recirculation, with the corresponding high free ammonia concentration, appeared to hinder the further improvement of Anammox performance. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available