4.7 Article

Removal of nitric oxide in rotating packed bed by ferrous chelate solution

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 181, Issue -, Pages 624-629

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.12.027

Keywords

NO absorption; Ferrous chelate; Rotating packed bed; Removal efficiency

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20821004, 20990221, 21176013]
  2. National 973 Program of China [2009CB219903]
  3. National 863 Program of China [2009AA033301]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As a major pollutant flue gas, nitric oxide (NO) emission has received great attention of the world. Various technologies have been developed to reduce NO emission. Among them, wet scrubbing approach seems to be promising concept. Ferrous chelate solution has been demonstrated as a suitable and efficient option in flue gas denitrification process due to its high reaction rate with NO and good regeneration ability. However, NO absorption rate is strongly affected by mass transfer limitation of NO and Fe-II(EDTA) solution in traditional reactors. In this study, RPB is firstly introduced as a gas-liquid reactor to enhance the NO removal efficiency by Fe-II(EDTA) solution. Preliminary experimental results are presented on the absorption of NO by investigating the effects of operating parameters on NO removal efficiency in RPB. The removal efficiency peaks when the pH value of the absorbent reaches 7. The optimum temperature for this gas-liquid absorption system is in the range of 293-303 K. When the gravity level of the RPB is higher than 150 g, the removal efficiency could reach 87%. In addition, the NO removal efficiency decreases with the increase of the gas-liquid ratio. The simultaneous increase of the gas and the liquid flow rates has no obvious effect on the removal efficiency. The obtained results imply a great potential of RPB in the removal of NO from flue gases. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available