4.7 Article

Batch and semi-continuous anaerobic digestion of Palmaria palmata: Comparison with Saccharina latissima and inhibition studies

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 209, Issue -, Pages 513-519

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.08.010

Keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Macroalgae; Methane; Cation inhibition

Funding

  1. French National Research Agency (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Macroalgae are biomass resources that can represent a valuable feedstock to produce renewable energy via methane production. In order to diversify the feedstock of raw materials for anaerobic digestion new kind of macroalgae are investigated. Composition of the algae Palmaria palmata is suggested to be a good substrate for anaerobic digestion due to its high content in volatile solids and low content of cations. In this study. P. palmata was investigated and compared to Saccharina latissima for biogas production in both batch and semi-continuous reactors. P. palmata permitted a better production of methane than for S. latissima either in batch (279 mL CH4 g(vs)(-1) vs 210 mL CH4 g(vs)(-1)) or in semi-continuous reactor (320 ml CH4 g(vs)(-1) 270 mL CH4 g(vs)(-1)). In semi-continuous experiments, after 182 days of operation, a decrease in reactor performances such as methane yields occurred above a specific loading rate in the order of 408 g(vs) kgv(ss)(-1) d(-1). Inhibition by potassium and sodium observed in semi-continuous mode was confirmed by batch experiments. The initial methane production rate was reduced by 53% when potassium and sodium concentrations were equivalent to the ones observed at semi-continuous reactor failure (13.0 g L-1 for potassium and 4.1 g L-1 for sodium). The lower performances of semi-continuous anaerobic digestion of S. latissima than the ones obtained with P. palmata, may be increased by a higher accumulation of cations. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available