4.7 Article

Hydrogen production from oxidative reforming of methane on supported nickel catalysts: An experimental and modeling study

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 197, Issue -, Pages 407-413

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.05.043

Keywords

Oxidative reforming; Methane; Modeling; Nickel; Hydrogen production

Funding

  1. Capes, Fapemig, CNPq
  2. Rede Brasileira de H2

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nickel catalysts supported on Al2O3, CeO2/Al2O3, Ce0.5Zr0.5O2/Al2O3, and Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 were investigated for methane oxidative reforming. BET surface area results showed that the catalysts containing alumina presented higher surface area which favored better nickel dispersion. This was confirmed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) data from the reduced samples. XRD analysis of the calcined catalysts also showed the formation of a ceria-zirconia solid solution. In fact, the addition of CeO2 and CeZrO2 to alumina provided higher oxygen storage capacities as observed by CO2 formation during CO-TPD. Temperature Programmed Reduction and Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy experiments revealed that samples containing alumina showed higher interaction between metal and support. Samples supported on alumina showed similar methane conversions during oxidative reforming, which could be related to similar nickel dispersions. A literature based kinetic model was used to compare data predicted by this model with the experimental behavior. The model results of methane conversions and composition profiles indicated that high temperatures should be used in order to obtain a maximum in H-2 production. The model predicted smaller methane and oxygen conversions, as well as, lower H-2 and CO molar fractions than the ones observed experimentally. This happened probably due to the fact that the kinetic expressions used were obtained at lower temperatures, lower conversions and with a different catalyst. Despite these differences, the general behavior was predicted by the model. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available