4.7 Article

Enhanced anaerobic degradation of organic pollutants in a soil microbial fuel cell

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 172, Issue 2-3, Pages 647-653

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.06.024

Keywords

Anaerobic degradation; In situ remediation; Organic pollutants; Soil microbial fuel cell

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20807012, 40801119, 40171157]
  2. foundation of the State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau [10501-264]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The anaerobic degradation of organic pollutants is generally slower than under aerobic conditions. With the aim of in situ remediation of anoxic soils contaminated with organic pollutants, an insertion-type soil microbial fuel cell (MFC) was constructed and inserted into waterlogged soil to enhance the biodegradation of phenol and simultaneously electricity generation. The highest power density reached 29.45 mW/m(2), and an internal resistance of approximately 140 Omega was obtained under an external loading of 100 Omega. Under closed-circuit conditions, 90.1% of the phenol was removed after the soil MFC had operated for 10 days, but the degradation rates were only 27.6% and 12.3% under open-circuit and non-MFC conditions, respectively. The phenol degradation rate constant (k) under closed-circuit conditions was 0.390/day, which was approximately 23 times higher than under non-MFC conditions. The degradation of phenol was also positively correlated with the removal of soluble COD and particulate COD, indicating that the removal of organic pollutants and COD in waterlogged soils could be enhanced by a soil MFC system coupled with electricity generation. This method has important implications for soil remediation because it may accelerate the transformation or degradation of some toxic organic pollutants under anoxic conditions. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available