4.7 Article

Graphene/δ-MnO2 composite as adsorbent for the removal of nickel ions from wastewater

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 175, Issue -, Pages 1-7

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.08.010

Keywords

Microwave-assisted; GNS/MnO2; Ni (II) removal; Adsorption

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [51077014, 21003028]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Especial Fund [200902396]
  3. Fundamental Research funds for the Central Universities [HEUCF101006]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Fund [20080440871]
  5. State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology [ES201006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A type of graphene nanosheet/delta-MnO2 (GNS/MnO2) composite was synthesized by a microwave-assisted method. The Ni (II) removal potential of GNS/MnO2 from solution was investigated. Microstructure measurements show that nanoscale delta-MnO2 particles deposit on the surfaces of GNS well. The adsorption characteristics had been examined with respect to pH effect, removal kinetic data, equilibrium isotherms and thermodynamic data in batch experiments. The equilibrium data are fitted well by the pseudo-second-order kinetics, suggesting that a chemical sorption process plays a significant role in Ni (II) ions adsorption. Adsorption isotherm can be described by the Langmuir model. The saturate adsorption capacity of Ni (II) onto GNS/MnO2 is 46.6 mg g(-1) at room temperature, which is 1.5 and 15 times higher than those of pure delta-MnO2 and GNS, respectively. The positive values of both Delta H and Delta S suggest an endothermic reaction and increase in randomness at the solid-liquid interface during Ni (II) adsorption process. The negative Delta G values indicate a spontaneous adsorption process and GNS/MnO2 can be reused for 5 times with high recovery rate of 91%. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available