4.7 Article

Experimental study of porous tubular catalytic membranes for direct synthesis of hydrogen peroxide

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 165, Issue 3, Pages 924-933

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.10.011

Keywords

Hydrogen peroxide direct synthesis; Gas/liquid membrane contactor; Catalytic membrane; Pd/Al(2)O(3); Pd/TiO(2)

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology (Bundesministerium fur Wirtschaft und Technologie, BMWi) [14782]
  2. German Federation of Industrial Research Associations (Arbeitsgemeinschaft industrieller Forschungsvereinigungen e.V., AiF) [14782]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A continuous process for safe direct synthesis of H(2)O(2) from H(2) and O(2) over Pd-catalysts in a gas/liquid membrane contactor is proposed. As a prerequisite for the process a method was developed for coating of Pd based catalysts into the fine porous layer on the inside of asymmetric tubular membranes. The method reached uniform distribution and high dispersion of the Pd nano particles with ca. 11 nm size for a range of membrane geometries and lengths and a variety of membrane materials. For the selection of the best catalytic system additional experiments with supported catalysts were performed. They were prepared using the same materials and coating method as for the manufacture of the catalytic membranes. The principle of the membrane contactor was verified with 10 cm long single channel membranes with stable operation of the continuous system for more than 10 h at differential pressures up to 4.5 bar in methanol. Further, the role of key process parameters such as solvent type, system pressure and flow regime were assessed. Productivities up to 1.7 mol(H2O2) g(pd)(-1) h(-1) (6.1 mol(H2O2) m(-2) h(-1) related to the geometric surface area of the membrane) with a selectivity of 83% towards H(2)O(2) were achieved. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available