4.7 Article

Modeling the impacts of feed spacer geometry on reverse osmosis and nanofiltration processes

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 149, Issue 1-3, Pages 221-231

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2008.10.030

Keywords

Reverse osmosis; Nanofiltration; Computational fluid dynamics; Mass transfer; Water treatment

Funding

  1. UCLA Cota-Robles fund and graduate student opportunity award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Maximizing mass transfer and minimizing hydraulic losses in spiral wound elements is critical for designing effective and efficient reverse osmosis (RC) and nanofiltration (NF) processes. Herein we describe a multi-scale modeling approach, which links microscopic and macroscopic transport phenomena in spiral wound elements. Model simulations elucidate the impacts of feed spacer geometry on full-scale RO/NF system performance considering four representative water treatment scenarios: (1) RO membranes used to desalt ocean water, (2) low-pressure RO membranes used to desalt brackish water, (3) ultra-low pressure RO membranes used to purify wastewater, and (4) NF membranes used to soften a hard, fresh water. According to model simulations, feed spacer geometry had little impact on mass transfer; hence, engineering spacers to improve concentration polarization, trans-membrane osmotic pressure, or product water quality may prove difficult and yield limited benefits. In contrast, thinner filaments spread further apart significantly reduced hydraulic losses with negligible impacts to mass transfer. In addition, a few non-circular filament shapes produced even lower hydraulic losses, which might prove beneficial for RO/NF treatment of low salinity waters where hydraulic losses through spiral wound elements contribute significantly to the total process energy consumption. In high salinity waters, improved spacer designs may not significantly reduce energy consumption because hydraulic losses through spiral wound elements are relatively small. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available