4.7 Article

Electrochemical treatment of simulated beet sugar factory wastewater

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 151, Issue 1-3, Pages 149-159

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2009.02.008

Keywords

Electrochemical wastewater treatment; Optimization; Reaction kinetics; Response surface methodology; Sugar factory wastewater; Statistical experiment design

Funding

  1. Project Management Unit of Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrochemical treatment of simulated beet sugar factory wastewater was studied as an alternative treatment method for the first time in literature. Through the preliminary batch runs, appropriate electrode material was determined as iron due to high removal efficiency of chemical oxygen demand, COD, and turbidity. The effect of operational conditions, applied voltage, electrolyte concentration and waste concentration on COD removal percent and initial COD removal rate were investigated through response surface methodology, RSM. In the set of runs, highest COD removal and COD initial removal rate were realized as 86.36% and 43.65 mg/L min, respectively, after 8 h at the applied voltage of 12 V, 100% waste concentration with 50g/L NaCl. Treatment conditions were optimized by RSM where applied voltage was kept in the range, electrolyte concentration was minimized, waste concentration, COD removal percent and COD initial removal rate were maximized at 25 degrees C. Optimum conditions at 25 degrees C were estimated as 12 V applied voltage, 100% waste concentration and 33.05 g/L electrolyte concentration to achieve 79.66% and 33.69 mg/L min for COD removal and COD initial removal rate, respectively. Kinetic investigations denoted that reaction order of electrochemical treatment reaction was 1.2 with the activation energy of 5.17 kJ/mol. These results support the applicability of electrochemical treatment to the beet sugar factory wastewater as an alternative advanced wastewater treatment method with further research. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available