4.1 Article

Test-Retest Variability of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness and Macular Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness Measurements Using Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography

Journal

JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages e109-e115

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000203

Keywords

ganglion cell layer; glaucoma; test-retest; repeatability; optical coherence tomography

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose:To evaluate the test-retest variability of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) in measurement of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness.Methods:A total of 65 eyes of healthy subjects were enrolled in this observational cross-sectional study. RNFL thickness and GCIPL thickness were measured using the repeat scan optic cube and macular cube protocol using Cirrus HD-OCT (software version 6.0). A single operator obtained 3 measurements during 1 session to determine test-retest variability. Intrasession repeatability was defined by intraclass correlation, limits of agreement, and coefficient of variation.Results:The mean age of patients was 37.8915.11 years (range, 10 to 70 y). The mean RNFL thickness readings as measured during 3 sessions were 93.89 +/- 9.73, 93.63 +/- 10.00, and 93.55 +/- 9.64 m and average GCIPL thickness measurements were 82.90 +/- 4.61, 82.98 +/- 4.24, and 83.06 +/- 4.36 m, respectively. Coefficient of variation was 1.2 for average RNFL thickness and 0.82 for average GCIPL thickness. The intraclass correlation coefficient showed a good correlation between repeat measurements for both average RNFL and GCC thicknesses (0.994 and 0.990, respectively). The limits of agreement (95% confidence interval) for the 3 sessions ranged from -3.61 to 4.13 m for the average RNFL thickness and -2.55 to 2.40 m for GCIPL thickness measurements.Conclusions:In healthy eyes, Cirrus HD-OCT shows excellent intrasession repeatability for RNFL and GCIPL thickness measurements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available