4.4 Article

Basal topographic controls on rapid retreat of Humboldt Glacier, northern Greenland

Journal

JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY
Volume 61, Issue 225, Pages 137-150

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3189/2015JoG14J128

Keywords

Arctic glaciology; atmosphere/ice/ocean interactions; glacier calving; glacier fluctuations; glacier modelling

Funding

  1. Durham Doctoral Studentship
  2. UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) [NE/H020667]
  3. NNXAD33G
  4. UK NERC fellowship [NE/J018333/1]
  5. NERC [NE/J018333/1, NE/K004999/1, NE/H020667/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/J018333/1, NE/H020667/1, NE/K004999/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Discharge from marine-terminating outlet glaciers accounts for up to half the recent mass loss from the Greenland ice sheet, yet the causal factors are not fully understood. Here we assess the factors controlling the behaviour of Humboldt Glacier (HG), allowing us to evaluate the influence of basal topography on outlet glacier response to external forcing since part of HG's terminus occupies a large overdeepening. HG's retreat accelerated dramatically after 1999, coinciding with summer atmospheric warming of up to 0.19 degrees C a(-1) and sea-ice decline. Retreat was an order of magnitude greater in the northern section of the terminus, underlain by a major basal trough, than in the southern section, where the bedrock is comparatively shallow. Velocity change following retreat was spatially non-uniform, potentially due to a pinning point near HG's northern lateral margin. Consistent with observations, numerical modelling demonstrates an order-of-magnitude greater sensitivity to sea-ice buttressing and crevasse depth (used as a proxy for atmospheric warming) in the northern section. The trough extends up to 72 km inland, so it is likely to facilitate sustained retreat and ice loss from HG during the 21st century.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available