4.3 Article

Coseismic and postseismic slip models of the 2011 Van earthquake, Turkey, from InSAR, offset-tracking, MAI, and GPS observations

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEODYNAMICS
Volume 91, Issue -, Pages 39-50

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jog.2015.08.006

Keywords

Van earthquake; Coseismic; Postseismic; Slip model; SAR geodesy

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation for Post-doctoral Scientists of China [2015M570722]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41504004]
  3. Shenzhen Scientific Research and Development Funding Program [ZDSY20121019111146499, JSGG20121026111056204]
  4. Shenzhen Dedicated Funding of Strategic Emerging Industry Development Program [JCYJ20121019111128765]
  5. CSK AO PI [2297]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We derived the coseismic and postseismic slip models of the 2011 Van earthquake from multi-source geodetic datasets, including interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR), multi-aperture InSAR (MAI), offset-tracking, and GPS measurements. The constrained least squares algorithm and Laplacian smoothing were used to estimate and regularize the slip distribution. The coseismic slip model suggested two nearly W-E striking segment faults breaking during the Van event. Two main slip concentrations were found to to be located at depths ranging from 7 km to 20 km. The estimated moment reached 6.08 x 10(19) Nm (equal to an Mw 7.19 event). A stress change analysis showed that the main shock imposed an up to similar to 5 bars stress load on the causative fault of the 9 November aftershock, implying a triggering mechanism between the two events. The postseismic slips of the Van earthquake were dominated by shallow left-lateral and deep thrust components. The slips distributed in most of the unruptured area of the fault plane. The accumulated postseismic moment reached 2.04 x 10(19) Nm, which was about 34% of the main shock moment. We conclude that the future seismic hazard will be relatively low in this area. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available