4.7 Article

Determination of differential code biases with multi-GNSS observations

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEODESY
Volume 90, Issue 3, Pages 209-228

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00190-015-0867-4

Keywords

Multi-GNSS experiment (MGEX); Differential code bias (DCB); Timing group delay (TGD); Intra-frequency bias; Inter-frequency bias; IGGDCB; Total electronic content (TEC)

Funding

  1. National 973 [2012CB825604]
  2. China Natural Science Funds [41231064, 41304034, 41104012, 41621063]
  3. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [4144094]
  4. CAS/SAFEA International Partnership Program for Creative Research Teams [KZZD-EW-TZ-05]
  5. State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earth's Dynamics (Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, CAS) [SKLGED2014-3-1-E]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to better understand the differential code biases (DCBs) of global navigation satellite system, the IGGDCB method is extended to estimate the intra-and inter-frequency biases of the global positioning system (GPS), GLONASS, BeiDou navigation satellite system (BDS), and Galileo based on observations collected by the multi-GNSS experiment (MGEX) of the international GNSS service (IGS). In the approach of IGGDCB, the local ionospheric total electronic content is modeled with generalized triangular series (GTS) function rather than using a global ionosphere model or a priori ionospheric information. The DCB estimated by the IGGDCB method is compared with the DCB products from the Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE) and German Aerospace Center (DLR), as well as the broadcast timing group delay (TGD) parameters over a 2-year span (2013 and 2014). The results indicate that GPS and GLONASS intra-frequency biases obtained in this work show the same precision levels as those estimated by DLR (about 0.1 and 0.2-0.4 ns for the two constellations, respectively, with respect to the products of CODE). The precision levels of IGGDCB-based inter-frequency biases estimated over the 24-month period are about 0.29 ns for GPS, 0.56 ns for GLONASS, 0.36 ns for BDS, and 0.24 ns for Galileo, respectively. Here, the accuracies of GPS and GLONASS biases are assessed relative to the products of CODE, while those of BDS and Galileo are compared with the estimates of DLR. In addition, the monthly stability indices of IGGDCB-based DCBs are 0.11 (GPS), 0.18 (GLONASS), 0.17 (BDS), and 0.14 (Galileo) ns for the individual constellation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available