4.6 Article

Concentrations of toxic metals and ecological risk assessment for sediments of major freshwater lakes in China

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOCHEMICAL EXPLORATION
Volume 157, Issue -, Pages 15-26

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2015.05.010

Keywords

Toxic metals; Ecological risk; Lake sediment; Freshwater lakes; China

Funding

  1. New Round Land and Resource Survey Project
  2. Nation Soil Current Situation Survey
  3. Pollution Prevention special project
  4. Geological Survey and Mineral Resources Assessment Project [1212011220055, 121201511218]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A systematic geochemical lake sediment survey has been carried out in major freshwater lakes in China. Surface lake sediment (0-20 cm) at a density of 1 sample/4 km(2) and deep lake sediment (150-180 cm) at a density of 1 sample/16 km(2) were collected and analyzed with standard procedures. This overview provides a current ecological risk assessment for toxic metal contamination (As, Cd, Cr, Cu. Hg, Ni, Pb, and Zn) in the surface sediments of major freshwater lakes in China. Lake sediment in China poses a moderate ecological risk on a nationwide basis using a potential ecological risk index (PERI). Mercury ranked as presenting the greatest ecological risk, followed by Cd, As, Pb, Cu, Ni, Cr, and Zn. Liangzi Lake was classified as having high ecological risk; Dalonghu Lake, Dianchi Lake, Dongting Lake, Fuxian Lake, and Qilu Lake as having moderate ecological risk; while the other surveyed lakes were classified as having low ecological risk. Uncertainties of risk assessment are also discussed by considering geochemical background, the eco-toxicity of metals and the sensitivities of local benthic communities. These comprehensive findings have provided valuable information for improvement of lake management and pollution prevention and control in China. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available