4.5 Article

A rapid and precise method for measuring stable carbon isotope ratios of dissolved inorganic carbon

Journal

MARINE CHEMISTRY
Volume 69, Issue 1-2, Pages 153-161

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4203(99)00102-4

Keywords

stable isotopes; carbon dioxide; C-13

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We describe a method for rapid preparation, concentration and stable isotopic analysis of dissolved inorganic carbon (delta(13)C-DIC). Liberation of CO2 was accomplished by placing 100 mu l phosphoric acid and 0.9 ml water in an evacuated 1.7-ml gas chromatograph (GC) injection vial. Following equilibration, the vial headspace gas was injected into a gas chromatograph-combustion-isotope ratio mass spectrometer (GC-C-IRMS) using a standard GC autosampler. A correction factor of -1.0 parts per thousand must be added to all isotopic measurements due to the equilibrium isotopic fractionation between the aqueous and gaseous phases in the sample vials. The method allows for the preparation and analysis of 48 samples, in triplicate, in a 40-h period. We report on the analysis of an inter-laboratory CaCO3 standard, as well as two natural water samples. Samples analyzed between 15 and 36 h after preparation exhibited standard deviations of +/-0.2 parts per thousand, while standards analyzed at varying concentrations and injection volumes had standard deviations of +/-0.1 parts per thousand with a minimum concentration of 0.20 mM DIC. Additionally, chromatographic area vs, concentration of standard carbon yielded an r(2) = 0.996, indicating that DIC concentrations can also be obtained from the GC-C-IRMS data, if desired. Further, the standard deviations observed during the analysis of natural water samples from a seagrass dominated lagoon with diel variations of 1.5 parts per thousand were consistent with those observed in laboratory standard analysis. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available