4.5 Article

Effect of tacrine on EEG slowing in the rat: Enhancement by concurrent monoamine therapy

Journal

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages 135-143

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0197-4580(00)00108-1

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; EEG slowing; acetylcholine; monoamines; tacrine; imipramine; pargyline; fluoxetine; EEG restoration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A dominant electrophysiological characteristic of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the loss of desynchronized EEG activity and shift toward low-frequency EEG synchronization. In rats, similar EEG changes resulted from administering the anti-cholinergic scopolamine(2 mg/kg) and the monoamine depletor reserpine (10 mg/kg); amplitude increases between 0.5-20 Hz, with the delta (0.5-4 Hz) and theta (4-8 Hz) bands affected most severely. The acetylcholinesterase inhibitor tacrine, at doses between 10 and 20 mg/kg, reversed these EEG changes; co-administration of tacrine and the noradrenaline-serotonin reuptake inhibitor imipramine (10 mg/kg) enhanced tacrine's action to suppress delta activity. Go-administration of tacrine and the monoamine-oxidase inhibitor pargyline (20 mg/kg) enhanced EEG restoration by tacrine in all frequency bands between 0.5 to 20 Hz, but co-administration of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine (2 mg/kg) was ineffective. These results show that some drug therapies aimed at concurrently stimulating cholinergic and monoaminergic neurotransmission are more effective in reversing EEG slowing than cholinergic therapy alone. Significant monoaminergic deficits occur in Alzheimer's disease, in addition to the atrophy of cholinergic neurons. Thus, combined cholinergic-monoaminergic therapy may provide an enhanced restoration of cortical functioning, in addition to limiting the required treatment dose of cholinesterase inhibitors. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available