3.8 Article Proceedings Paper

UVA, pheomelanin and the carcinogenesis of melanoma

Journal

PIGMENT CELL RESEARCH
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages 140-144

Publisher

MUNKSGAARD INT PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0749.13.s8.25.x

Keywords

melanin; melanocytes; DNA damage; sunlight; UV

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cloudman S91 mouse melanoma cells var!, in constitutive and inducible melanin levels. Survival, mutation induction and DNA damage a ere quantitated after exposure to UVB, UVA and FS20 lamps. Assuming that the observed differences are related to melanin, induced pigment is photo-protective for survival and mutation after UVB and FS20 exposure, and is photosensitizing for survival after UVA exposure, No changes in pyrimidine dimers could be measured. DNA damage in pigmented mouse melanocytes (melan-a and melan-b) was greater than that in albino melanocytes (melan-c) after UVB and FS20, and the pigmented cells were moro sensitive to killing. Pigment appears to be protective for killing by UVA in these melanocytes. Human melanocytes from different skin h-pes vary in both melanin amount and composition (eu- and pheomelanin). Effects of pigmentation on UVB responses are unclear. In UVA, heavily pigmented cells have more DNA damage than lightly pigmented cells, but are resistant to killing. Increased pheomelanin photosensitizes DNA damage in lightly pigmented cells, Since eumelanin predominates in the mouse melanoma cells and melanocytes, they are less likely than human cells to provide a satisfactory model for human solar melanomagenesis, In order to understand the mechanism of photocarcinogenesis of melanoma, melanins in human melanocytes from different pigment types should be carefully quantitated and characterized. Mutations induced in them by solar wavelength-emitting lamps with cell-characterized spectra should be measured, and mutant DNA should be sequenced to determine the nature of the solar-induced lesions. Research should focus on UVA and pheomelanin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available