4.6 Article

15 years of R&D in central solar heating in Denmark

Journal

SOLAR ENERGY
Volume 69, Issue 6, Pages 437-447

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0038-092X(00)00118-3

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Danish R&D activities during the last two decades in the field of Central Solar Heating Plants and Thermal Energy Storage Technologies are presented. The most relevant central solar heating plants (CSHPs), with and without seasonal storage, are examined and essential experiences highlighted. The Saltum and Ry plants represent the type of CSHPs with preheating the return stream of a district heating net and no storage involved. The Marstal plant represents an alternative approach, connecting the CSHP to the delivery pipe for summer operation. Here the plant involves short-term storage and the application of variable flow that lead to novelties in the control strategy. The plant is described and experiences are analysed. The presented cases show that the technology, under special conditions, can be economically competitive with other heating technologies. Under normal conditions, public funding and acceptance of higher energy price are necessary. Further technical development and push towards a market is required. Especially the development of economical storage technologies is decisive. Work with steel tanks, concrete tanks, aquifer storage, bore hole storage and most importantly, from a Danish view, pit water storage is presented and conclusions are drawn. R&D in the field of CSHPs call for international co-operation, knowledge transfer and not least financing. The structural and political climate that shapes the boundaries of the R&D activities and also makes up the dominant barrier for the dissemination of CSHPs is discussed. Conclusions are drawn and future work outlined. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available