4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Chemoprotection against cancer by induction of Phase 2 enzymes

Journal

BIOFACTORS
Volume 12, Issue 1-4, Pages 5-11

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.1002/biof.5520120102

Keywords

glutathione transferase; glutathione; NAD(P)H : quinone reductase; heme oxygenase; gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase; epoxide hydrolase; ferritin; electrophile toxicity; redox cycling; antioxidants; reactive oxygen species

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA44530] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P01CA044530] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Induction of Phase 2 enzymes is an effective and sufficient strategy for achieving protection against the toxic and neoplastic effects cf many carcinogens. It is proposed that the concept of Phase 2 enzymes as being responsible only for the conjugation of functionalized xenobiotics with endogenous cellular ligands such as glutathione (glutathione S-transferases) and glucuronic acid (UDP-glucuronosyltransferases) be expanded to include proteins with the following common characteristics: (a) coordinate induction by a broad range of chemical agents that all have the capacity to react with sulfhydryl groups; (b) possible regulation by common promoter elements; and (c) catalysis of reactions that lead to comprehensive protection against electrophile and reactive oxygen toxicities, by a wide variety of mechanisms. These mechanisms include: conjugation with endogenous ligands, chemical modification of reactive features of molecules that can damage DNA and other macromolecules, and generation or augementation of cellular antioxidants. In addition to the above conjugating enzymes, a provisional and partial list of Phase 2 proteins might include: NAD(P)H:quinone reductase, epoxide hydrolase, dihydrodiol dehydrogenase, gamma -glutamylcysteine synthetase, heme oxygenase-1, leukotriene B1 dehydrogenase, aflatoxin B-4 dehydrogenase, and ferritin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available