4.5 Article

Sequential mRNA expression for immediate early genes, cytokines, and neurotrophins in spinal cord injury

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages 203-218

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2000.17.203

Keywords

acute spinal cord injury; cytokines; glucocorticoid; immediate early genes; in situ hybridization; neurotrophins

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this communication, we demonstrate the sequential expression of endogenous molecules, including immediate early genes (IEGs), cytokines, neurotrophins, and neurotrophin receptors in the injured spinal cord. In the acute phase, expression of IEGs and cytokines mRNAs were rapidly upregulated within 1 h in nonneuronal cells in the lesioned sites and the surrounding spinal white and gray matter. Maximal expression was observed at 1 h for c-fos and TNF-alpha mRNAs, at 3 h for c-jun and IL-6 mRNAs, and at 6 h for IL-1 beta mRNA, and these signals were virtually nondetectable after 6-12 h from the onset of the injury. Some of these genes products may promote the degeneration of damaged cells and tissues, while others may be involved in the subsequent repair processes. In the subacute phase, expression of NGF, BDNF, NT-3, p75LNGFR and Trk B mRNAs began to increase in the nonneuronal cells and neuronal cells from 6 h, and peaked at 24-72 h in the area where expression of mRNAs for IEGs and cytokines overlapped. Signals for IL-6 mRNA were also observed in motoneurons at 24-72 h after the injury, with the suggestion that these molecules may be involved in promoting axonal sprouting in the injured spinal cord. Of further interest was the finding that this upregulation of IL-1 beta, BDNF, and NT-3 mRNAs in injured spinal cord was attenuated by treatment with high dose glucocorticoids, with the suggestion that the downregulation of BDNF and NT-3 might be disadvantageous to survival and axonal sprouting of spinal neurons.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available