4.2 Article

Reliability and stability of contingent negative variation

Journal

APPLIED PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY AND BIOFEEDBACK
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 33-41

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1023/A:1009533405695

Keywords

contingent negative variation; reliability; interstimulus interval

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reliability parameters of a test indicate the stability (and quality) of the test itself Reliability coefficients greater than 0.70 suggest an attribute as being sufficiently stable over time to be characterized as a trait. Reliability parameters of contingent negative variation (CNV) amplitudes in 27 healthy individuals were determined using a test-retest design. CNV was recorded at Cz, with an interstimulus interval of 3 s, on 2 separate occasions. initial session and 10 days later Correlation coefficients between the 2 recording sessions were 0.675 for the total-CNV (tCNV), 0.855 for the early component(iCNV), 0.631 for the late component (iCNV), and 0.420 for the post-imperative negative variation (PINV). Statistical retest and 0.655 for PINV The iCNT, more than the other parameters, remained stable over the period of 10 days. It is suggested that the described standardized CNV recording procedure ensures reproducible and stable results in healthy subjects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available